HESTA rapped by ASIC over misleading performance figures

10 November 2023
| By Rhea Nath |
image
image
expand image

H.E.S.T. Australia Limited (HESTA), the trustee of HESTA super fund, has been hit with three infringement notices from the corporate regulator for alleged false or misleading statements made in their marketing material.

The fund has paid $48,600 to comply with the notices that focus on statements about its ‘Balanced Growth’ investment option and 10-year performance figures shared on HESTA’s Facebook and Instagram and in a webinar published on its website.

ASIC said the statements referenced 10-year performance figures of the Balanced Growth option but did not note the period the figures related to.

It alleged these statements may have misled consumers into believing the performance figures used were up to the present day, when the 10-year period used by HESTA to calculate those figures had ended between five and 14 months prior to publication.

The figures were published at various times between 23 August 2022 and 18 July 2023.

“ASIC was concerned that these figures were misleading because consumers were not given all the necessary information and might have assumed the fund was performing better than it was,” said ASIC deputy chair, Sarah Court.

“Funds commonly focus on performance in their advertising and promotional material. Advertising involving performance figures needs to be clear and transparent about how those figures are calculated. This allows consumers to make informed decisions, including choosing or moving between funds.”

She noted super is among the biggest investment decisions in an individual’s life and “it is a decision that must be based on accurate information.”

The corporate regulator stated it has reviewed almost 7,500 advertisements across print media, television, radio, digital and social media, including across platforms such as Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, in 2022. 

The infringement notices were issued in relation to statements contained in three communications made by HESTA:

  • Between 23 August 2022 and 21 October 2022, HESTA published an advertisement on Facebook and Instagram stating the Balanced Growth option “has returned 8.87 per cent average returns p.a. over the past 10 years”. The date range was not provided in the advertisement. The average return for the 10-year period to the time of the advertisements was between 8.01 per cent and 8.51 per cent.
  • Between 21 October 2022 and 20 June 2023, HESTA published an advertisement on Facebook and Instagram stating the Balanced Growth option “has returned 8.53 per cent average returns p.a. over the past 10 years”. The date range was not provided in the advertisement. The average return for the 10-year period to the time of the advertisements was between 7.90 per cent and 8.23 per cent.
  • Between 9 December 2022 and 18 July 2023, HESTA published a webinar on its website regarding market volatility representing that a hypothetical consumer would have realised a net return of approximately $67,000 on a $50,000 investment by staying in the Balanced Growth option for 10 years “right up to today”, which was incorrect.

Payment of an infringement notice is not an admission of liability.

In a statement regarding the notices, a HESTA spokesperson said: "HESTA understands that the news that ASIC has issued infringement notices to HESTA will be as disappointing for our members as it is for us, especially given the high standards to which HESTA holds itself.

"We take regulatory compliance very seriously. We have cooperated with ASIC’s investigation and acknowledge and have acted on ASIC’s concerns. We have since improved our internal processes and strengthened our controls."

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

COMMENTS

The best news i have read for years . They have had it coming for soooo long.
So we not only had to battle CONFLICTED COMMISSION FOR YEARS BUT ALSO watching these union funds lie WHILE ASIC CHASED US FOR ANY LITTLE INFRINGEMENT.ME and my bowell cancer will celebrate today.a JG

Imagine the mainstream media outcry or even that of the ACTU if this had been other an industry fund caught out.

When are they going to crack down on the use of the word ‘balanced’ and what that should mean?

Compare the pair!

The content of this field is kept private and will not be shown publicly.

Recommended for you

subscribe

Stay up to date with Australia’s top news and information source for the wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Remus_au

Absolutely agree with you on this Les. That's how I see it too. The client facing "new" SOA document might shrink down a...

2 days 17 hours ago
Stephen Eedy

Most advisers are now degree-qualified with many years of actual practical industry experience, and are fully-qualified ...

2 days 17 hours ago
Dominic Widlake

This is all so ridiculous. I have 33 years experience, and have studied hard over the last 4 years to obtain the gov...

2 days 17 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

5 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

4 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

5 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND