Caution advised on in-house assets

taxation/financial-advisers/super-fund/

15 February 2013
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

Financial advisers need to be careful at every point about whether parties are related when considering in-house assets in super, according to Cooper Grace Ward partner Scott Hay-Bartlem.

Their own first reaction on whether someone was a related party was almost always wrong, Hay-Bartlem said.

The regulatory provisions were rather torturous, he said.

The relationship between parties has to be looked at on every level of an in-house asset arrangement because the words ‘related party' could be found throughout the in-house asset rules, Hay-Bartlem warned.

The related party concept was the source of many of the misunderstandings concerning in-house assets, he said.

Many of the words in the relevant rules have a wide, extended definition, and that was important when considering in-house assets, Hay-Bartlem warned.

For example, the extended definition of a ‘loan' in a limited recourse borrowing arrangement (LRB) could encompass something that wouldn't normally be classified as a loan, Hay-Bartlem warned.

He also warned that if trustees leave an entitlement in a unit trust unpaid for long enough, it will fall under in-house asset rules as another form of financial accommodation.

The definition of a ‘lease arrangement' was also extensive, covering any situation where someone uses property owned by the super fund, Hay-Bartlem said.

He told delegates to consider using unit trusts as an alternative to an LRB, as it could achieve the same or better results in a much simpler fashion.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

So we are now underwriting criminal scams?...

2 months 3 weeks ago

Glad to see the back of you Steve. You made financial more expensive, not more affordable as you claim, and presided ...

3 months ago

Completely agree Peter. The definition of 'significant change is circumstances relevant to the scope of the advice' is s...

5 months ago

ASIC has suspended the Australian Financial Services Licence of a Melbourne-based financial advice firm....

2 weeks 3 days ago

The corporate regulator has issued infringement notices to three AFSLs whose financial advisers provided personal advice to a retail client while unregistered....

3 weeks 1 day ago

ASIC has released the results of its first adviser exam to be held in 2025, with 241 candidates attempting the test....

3 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND