Aussies believe they will outlive savings

Over half of older Australians are worried they will outlive their savings, and two-thirds of retirees who have been retired five years expect to spend their savings over the next 20 years, according to the National Seniors Australia (NSA).

The NSA’s latest research, in partnership with Challenger, found of those worried of outliving their savings, women (59%) were more worried than men (47%).

People without any super reported the highest levels of worry, with 23% worrying frequently, the advocacy group said.

Related News:

NSA chief executive, Professor John McCallum, said: “Australia has one of the best pension systems in the world, yet Australian retirees are still showing high levels of worry that they will outlive their savings.

“This shows a need for better advice and education to help older Australians manage their savings so they can have the confidence to spend their money and enjoy retirement.”

NSA noted that women were more worried than men due to the higher likelihood of relying on the age pension as their main source of income. Divorced women were among the most worried about their financial situation in retirement.

Challenger chair of retirement income, Jeremy Cooper, said while women on average lived three years longer than men, the super system did not cater for this difference in longevity.

“…[The] research clearly highlights is that people treat the age pension and their own savings differently. They fear running out of their own money, even though the safety net of the age pension will be there for them,” he said.

“This sends a strong signal that people worry about being solely reliant on the age pension. It’s therefore important that super funds explore ways of providing more lifetime income to their members.”

The research also found that having a reliable source income that would last for life was a key factor for worrying less, with those people with a defined benefit pension or a lifetime annuity reporting the lowest levels of worry.

Recommended for you




Re "Australia has one of the best pension systems in the world" This is simply incorrect. If fact Australia has the stingiest welfare systems in the OECD.

Also regards the Age pension, please note
"I draw your attention to the ‘Welfare Act 1946’ and it’s repeal act of 1985.
In 1944, Labor Prime Minister (Ben Chifley) introduced 3 bills to establish the ‘National Welfare Fund’, to be funded by a compulsory Contribution (levy) of 1/6 in the pound (20/-) on all personal income. The Opposition Leader would only give bilateral support to these bills if the funds collected were held in a separate account and not general revenue. Prime Minister Chifley agreed and established The National Welfare Fund as at 01/01/1946. It was a ‘Trust’ Fund with the federal Parliament as ‘Trustee’. The compulsory contribution (levy) commenced as of this date. In 1950 the fund held almost 100,000,000 pounds. From this date onwards when Menzies was Prime Minister the levy was grouped with the Consolidated Revenue Account. The sabotage of the National Welfare Fund had commenced. All governments from this date raided the fund for general expenses and in 1977 Prime Minister Malcolm Fraser transferred the balance (Approx. $470,000,000) to the consolidated Revenue Account.
In 1985 the Labor Government repealed the act of 1945 thereby finally ending the National Welfare Funds Act. However, the 7.5% income tax levy was not repealed and to this day continues to be collected as a portion of Income tax revenue.
All persons in Australia who have paid personal income tax since 1946 have contributed to their age pension and as such the Age Pension is fully funded. It is not the fault of the age pensioners if the governments over the years have squandered their pension funds for general expenses."

Add new comment