Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Volatility, FOFA force financial planners to cut costs

market-volatility/global-financial-crisis/industry-super-funds/FOFA/financial-planning/money-management/financial-advice/government/

12 September 2012
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

Most financial planning principals have felt the need to reduce costs within their businesses, with many targeting support services or cutting back on factors such as platform costs, according to a survey conducted by Money Management.

The survey, conducted during the last week of August and first week of September, revealed two primary drivers for the cost-cutting - market volatility leading to client nervousness, and uncertainty flowing from the Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) changes.

The survey revealed that 88 per cent of respondents had felt the need to reduce costs in their businesses, with nearly 60 per cent of those who had not already done so indicating cost-cutting was probably inevitable.

{^image|(width)600|(height)168|(mouseoverheight)224|(url)http://media.cirrusmedia.com.au/Money_Media_Library/Print_Images/120913…"margin-left: 40px; ">
"Difficulty convincing new clients [of] the value of advice, especially ongoing services as opposed to transactional strategic advice."

"Reduced commissions because of market instability."

"Uncertainty with the implementation of FOFA and future value of the business makes me wary of additional investment in staff and technology."

"Reduced revenue following GFC [global financial crisis] has put a strain on cashflow."

"Uncertainty, clients wanting more for less, pressure on fees, need to streamline processes."

"Cost of providing a full service option for the majority of my clients and having reliable support staff to assist with this service is creating a higher cost. Many of my clients will need to either pay more for my full service or downgrade their level of service."

"In process of changing to fee-for-service model to meet FOFA compliance for this administration work. When further details from ASIC are available, additional costs will be incurred to comply with the proposed regulations, and setting up new computer systems and staff workflows will incur more costs.

"The figure of $11 p.a. per client quoted by the Industry Super Funds to comply with the FOFA legislation is nowhere near the true cost that will be added to my practice running costs."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 3 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 3 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND