Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Tax reform needed over GST and public sector service funding

ABA/funding/taxation/productivity-commission/

4 September 2017
| By Hope William-Smith |
image
image image
expand image

The banking industry is largely in support of equal access to publicly funded services, but the way GST is distributed still needs addressing to preserve efficiency and fairness in Australia’s tax system, according to the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA).

Former Queensland premier and ABA chief executive Anna Bligh called out the goods and services tax (GST) distribution history over the past two decades, saying “unintended and undesirable consequences” were part of the mechanism for its distribution.

In the ABA’s submission to the Productivity Commission inquiry into horizontal fiscal equalisation, Bligh said there was legitimacy to the view that GST had not worked in line with its original envisaged outcome.

“The distribution should be able to better respond to fluctuations in revenue sources, to avoid unplanned budget deficits and financial market disruption,” she said.

“Australia needs well-considered tax reform that focuses on driving economic activity, investment and jobs.”

Bligh pointed at discrepancies within the provision of GST and called for more flexible strategy to address economic variables.

“States and territories derive limited benefit from some sources of revenue raising,” she said.

“It is clearly untenable for states such as Western Australia to receive a GST share of less than 35 cents in the dollar, nor was this possibility foreseen or intended by the original GST agreement.

“The distribution should be able to better respond to fluctuations in revenue sources, to avoid unplanned budget deficits and financial market disruption.”

The proposed major bank levy by South Australia was also touted as a key issue of concern by the ABA, with Bligh stating its introduction was in direct contradiction to the GST agreement to eliminate financial taxes.

“No state should gain a financial benefit from breaking the agreement,” she said.

“Banks pay GST on their inputs but do not collect GST on the financial services and products the provide [and] this ‘input-taxing’ of financial services means that GST becomes a direct cost to financial institutions.”

The draft report of the PC inquiry is expected in October.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 23 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND