Lawyers argue against post-sale product intervention
Proposed new financial product design and distribution laws should not extend to conduct that occurs after a financial product has been formally acquired, according to the Law Council of Australia.
In a submission filed with the Senate Economics Legislation Committee review of the Government’s Treasury Laws Amendment (Design and Distribution Obligations and Product Intervention Powers) Bill 2018, the Law Council said it believed an amendment was necessary with respect to the definition of “retail product distribution conduct”.
It suggested that this could influence the activities of distributors such as advisers and superannuation fund trustees where they might well give a Product Disclosure Statement to an existing superannuation fund member as a means of reminding the member of the features of their product.
The Law Council submission noted that a similar limitation had already been included in the Bill in relation to the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s product intervention powers.
It said that under that power, the legislation proposed that a product intervention order would not apply to a financial product that had already been acquired.
“Just as a product intervention order cannot apply to conduct that occurs after a financial product has been acquired, so too should the distribution obligations not apply to conduct that occurs after an acquisition has occurred,” the Law Council submission said.
Recommended for you
The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has lowered rates to a level not seen since mid-2023.
Financial Services Minister Stephen Jones has shared further details on the second tranche of the Delivering Better Financial Outcomes reforms including modernising best interests duty and reforming Statements of Advice.
The Federal Court has found a company director guilty of operating unregistered managed investment schemes and carrying on a financial services business without holding an AFSL.
The Governance Institute has said ASIC’s governance arrangements are no longer “fit for purpose” in a time when financial markets are quickly innovating and cyber crime becomes a threat.
