FPA and AFA lobby on FOFA key issues

fpa-chief-executive/afa-chief-executive/FPA/financial-advisers/AFA/FOFA/government/chief-executive/association-of-financial-advisers/parliamentary-joint-committee/federal-opposition/

8 March 2012
| By Mike Taylor |
image
image image
expand image

Australia's two major financial planning organisations, the Financial Planning Association (FPA) and the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA), have ramped up their lobbying of the key independents in the House of Representatives in the wake of what they regard as a disappointing Parliamentary Joint Committee (PJC) report.

FPA chief executive Mark Rantall has written to members assuring them "the fight is far from over" and that he and his team will be continuing to lobby both the Government and the independents on key concerns.

He outlined those concerns as being that the current legislation and the PJC's recommendations:

  • Do not deliver on the goal of improved access to financial advice, and are particularly without clarity regarding how scaled advice works with best interest legislation.
  • Consumers face greater risk with the opt-in renewal notice requirement, as the key protection mechanism to advice and dispute resolution schemes will be removed.
  • Additional fee disclosure statements for both existing (retrospective) and new clients are redundant. Fee disclosure obligations already exist for advisers and product providers in disclosing fees to the client.

Rantall's letter said that while the Government was considering the PJC report recommendations, the FPA would be directing its energies towards encouraging them to consider recommendations that would better achieve FOFA's objectives.

At the same time as the FPA has written to members, the AFA has exhorted its members to continue lobbying all parliamentarians, including the independents.

In doing so, it has distilled its concerns about FOFA to five key issues:

  1. Removal of retrospective fee disclosure requirements.
  2. Removal of the opt-in obligation.
  3. Improve the clarity and certainty with the best interests duty.
  4. Adequately ensure that the ban on conflicted remuneration is not applied retrospectively.
  5. Delay commencement until the industry can be prepared.

 AFA chief executive Richard Klipin has made it clear he believes the tenor of the Government's PJC report indicates it has returned to a harder line on FOFA and that, therefore, any amendments will be reliant on the Federal Opposition and the independents.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 11 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo