Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

FOFA's stockbroking commission ban ill-considered

FOFA/australian-securities-exchange/financial-advice/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/corporations-act/

11 August 2011
| By Chris Kennedy |
image
image image
expand image

A ban on stockbroking commissions proposed in the Government's Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reform package will be detrimental for the industry and have unintended consequences, according to the Stockbrokers Association of Australia.

The impact of such a ban has not been fully considered in the framing of FOFA reforms, according to the association's official submission.

The stockbrokers argue the ban should not apply to direct equities because the commissions are paid directly to the broking firm by the client rather than by the product issuer on a per-transaction basis, meaning the payments are essentially a fee for service model already. Payments are also fully disclosed and product neutral, the submission noted.

The issue of churning by stockbrokers has also been grossly overstated, with clients protected from the practice by Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) market integrity rules, Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) operating rules as well as the Corporations Act, the submission stated.

The association said its proposals are in line with regulations in the UK and Europe where similar reforms don't cover direct equities.

The submission advised that any proposed ban in stamping fees would cause difficulties for Australian companies raising capital, and therefore reduce opportunities for investors and damage Australia's potential to grow as a financial centre.

Stockbroking firms providing services to the clients of licensed intermediaries should also not be caught by the FOFA ban because the advisory relationship remains between the client and intermediary and fees are charged on a fee for service basis and are transparent and product neutral, the submission stated.

The association also said it had not been properly consulted in the same way other segments of the industry had. The association complained that the release of draft legislation is now imminent and there had been no period allowed for policy discussion, with the only communication provided to stockbrokers coming from an FAQ on the FOFA website.

Homepage

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND