Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ATO chided for SMSF-centric draft determination

superannuation-funds/taxation/SMSFs/APRA/self-managed-superannuation-funds/ATO/australian-taxation-office/ASFA/association-of-superannuation-funds/superannuation-industry/australian-prudential-regulation-authority/

10 September 2013
| By Staff |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Taxation Office (ATO) has been taken to task for issuing a Draft Taxation Determination on the segregation of pension assets with self-managed superannuation funds (SMSFs) in mind — and therefore not taking into account the implications for major funds administered by the Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA).

In a submission to the ATO dealing with the draft determination, the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA) said the determination "appears to have been written primarily with its applicability to an SMSF in mind" — something which was evidenced by all of the examples using funds with one or two members only.

However it said segregation, and what is necessary to constitute effective segregation, was a growing subject of interest to the large APRA-regulated superannuation funds and their advisers.

"Due to the increasing complexity of arrangements within the superannuation industry, ASFA welcomes the intention of the ATO to bring some clarity to the operation of the law in this area," the ASFA submission said.

However the submission added, "ASFA considers that if the ATO is proposing to issue a tax determination on this topic then it is critical that the determination also considers the subject matter from the perspective of large APRA-regulated funds, and the variety of arrangements such funds may have for the allocation of earnings (and the potential disconnection between these arrangements and the fund's actual investments for different sub-groups of members)".

The submission reinforced the fact that ASFA was concerned that the ATO's draft determination was based on the operation of an SMSF and "does not reflect the operations of a large APRA-regulated fund or a defined benefit fund".

Further, the submission argued that some of the interpretations contained in the draft determination could drive up complexity and costs for large APRA-regulated funds.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 4 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND