Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

ASX200 companies fail in whistle-blower support

Australian-Council-of-Superannuation-Investors/Louise-Davidson/regulation/Code-of-Conduct/whistle-blowers/

14 March 2018
| By Hannah Wootton |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Council of Superannuation Investors (ASCI) has hit out at ASX200 companies for failing to support and protect whistle-blowers, finding that 38 ASX200 companies did not mention whistleblowing or how to report wrongdoing in their codes of conduct.

Research by the organisation found that many did not mention anonymity, accessibility or the avoidance of retaliation, which were key features of effective whistleblowing systems.

ACSI said that this was a significant oversight, as whistleblowing was intrinsically linked to ethical conduct. It was also problematic as whistleblowing is the initial source for a significant number of detected frauds.

“Unless codes of conduct provide guidance to employers on where to go to report misconduct and other important information such as how reporters will be protected then how can companies expect their whistleblowing systems to be effective? We think this is a significant missed opportunity,” ASCI chief executive, Louise Davidson, said.

ASCI also found that ASX200 companies were failing to address key risk areas in their codes of conduct. Its research found that fewer than two-thirds of companies cover five of 13 recommended topics in their codes, omitting many well-known business risks such as fair dealing, cybercrime, anti-money laundering and human rights.

The organisation warned that this could contribute to poor corporate cultures.

“Codes of conduct … are key foundations for good corporate culture. Effective design and implementation encourages ethical performance by employees and protects against inappropriate behaviour, but the quality and implementation of these resources is critical,” it said.

Davidson said that many companies did not properly support the implementation of their codes, with most failing to include an introduction by the CEO or practical tools to assist employees in the codes’ application, and were not regularly reviewed.

She said that companies having such large gaps in their codes of conduct and whistleblowing systems “represented a material risk to their reputation, licence to operate and value.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND