Clicky

Academics urge board to monitor ASIC and APRA

An over-arching assessment board should be appointed to provide continuous oversight of Australia’s financial services regulators, according to a new paper published by academics in Wollongong, New Zealand and West Australia.

The research, published in the Law and Financial Markets Review journal, was led by Dr Andy Schmulow, a senior lecturer at the University of Wollongong’s School of Law along with Karen Fairweather from the University of Auckland and John Tarrant from the University of Western Autralia.

They have pointed to what has been heard during the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services industry and suggested that the creation of an Assessment Board providing continuous oversight of the regulators would represent an effective solution to regulatory failures.

Related News:

The three academics have claimed the Royal Commission has provided ample evidence of the phenomenon of regulatory capture which, in turn, has led to a “financial regulatory crisis”, noting that regulatory capture occurs when agencies responsible for regulation have their efforts diverted away from public interest and act more favourably toward the interests of the industry groups who were subject to regulation.

Explaining the contents of their research, Schmulow and co-authors argue that the structure of financial regulation is fertile ground for capture, particularly as the close nature of supervision and monitoring required can lead to a “cosiness” between the regulator and the regulated.

“The notion that banks are ‘too big to fail’ leads to deferential treatment, particularly when the regulators can exercise discretion in enforcement actions,” Schmulow said, claiming that the Royal Commission had brought to light examples of regulatory capture, including where ASIC allowed major banks to water down announcements about industry misconduct.

To test the idea of a board of oversight, the researchers conducted an internationally comparative, cross-jurisdictional analysis of the method’s effectiveness to deter and prevent regulatory capture, including on the part of the UK’s Financial Policy Committee and the United States Government Accountability Office.

The three academics are arguing that the proposed assessment board be governed by a secretariat provided by The Treasury, but with the board at arm’s length from the bulk of Treasury and with its membership drawn from diverse, highly experienced people serving fixed terms to prevent one person or industry group dominating.




Related Content

ASIC wants good faith compliance on fees and costs

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) is looking to hold fund managers to account on RG 97 irrespective of ongoing consultation ...Read more

When being a chartered accountant is not enough

Being a chartered accountant for many years and not having breached the rules is not sufficient reason to be granted a limited Australian Financial Se...Read more

ASIC weak on super fee disclosure: ISA

Industry Super Australia (ISA) has warned that the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) latest recommendations on super fee...Read more

Author

Comments

Comments

ASIC seem mighty cosy ad chummy with ISA!

Will be the next big scandal to hit in future years when ISA hit issues and all this is all analysed to the same degree that banks and instos have undergone.

Add new comment