Significant design and claims handling issues in TPD found

TPD ASIC claims insurance

17 October 2019
| By Jassmyn |
expand image

The corporate watchdog has found 60% of total and permanent disability (TPD) activities of daily living (ADL) claims are declined, five times higher than the average decline rate for other TPD claims.

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) said many consumers could not rely on TPD insurance cover when they needed it most after it found a significant industry-wide problem with the design of TPD insurance and the claims handling process.

It said nearly half a million Australians were covered by a very narrow TPD policy definition that only paid out in the most catastrophic circumstances, if they were unable to perform several ADLs such as feeding, dressing or washing themselves.

It found that the poor claims handling process led to 12% of claims lodged with insurers failing to proceed with a decision as consumers withdrew their claims.

ASIC Commissioner, Sean Hughes, said: “Alarmingly, we found that three TPD claims a day are assessed under the restrictive ‘activities of daily living’ definition, which has a concerningly high decline rate.

“People that hold this type of automatic cover through superannuation are typically paying the same premium – for what is essentially junk insurance – as people who can access less-restrictive definitions under general TPD cover.

“We also find it inexcusable that insurers did not use, or in some cases even collect, data to enable them to identify the very poor consumer outcomes that are being produced because of these restrictive definitions.”

Hughes said superannuation trustees had a crucial role to play in the delivery of life insurance to their members and needed to act in their members’ best interests to provide access to affordable insurance products that were suitably designed for their members while safeguarding super balances from inappropriate erosion.

ASIC said the review identified that insurer practices such as difficult lodgement processes, poor communication practices, multiple requests for medical assessments, and excessive delays were just some of the problems consumers found during the claims assessment process.

It also found that claims from AMP, Asteron, and Westpac had declined claim rates higher than expected, and Asteron’s decline rate was double ASIC’s prediction.

ASIC said its data looked at 35,000 TPD claims and commission consumer research which focused on:

  • AIA Australia Limited;
  • AMP Life Limited and the National Mutual Life Association of Australasia Limited (part of the AMP Group of companies);
  • Asteron Life & Superannuation Limited – previously Suncorp Life & Superannuation Limited;
  • MetLife Insurance Limited;
  • MLC Limited;
  • TAL Life Limited; and
  • Westpac Life Insurance Services Limited.
Read more about:


Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry



Old Fella

Of course a survey commissioned by an adviser coaching business would find that having an external business coach is a k...

16 hours ago
One foot out the door

A financial planner is expected to earn between $95,000 and $120,000 per year, depending on the state. Really? I don't...

1 day 1 hour ago

The whole thing is a bit frightening especially the last note where notes on what might be done could result in the need...

1 day 22 hours ago

ASIC has cancelled the AFS licence of a Sydney wealth firm, the fifth Sydney firm to see a cancellation since the start of the year....

1 week 6 days ago

A former financial adviser has been banned by ASIC from providing financial services for inappropriate advice, among multiple breaches....

4 weeks ago

More than 20 winners from the funds management industry have been crowned at this year’s awards....

1 week ago