Insurers’ financial imperative to fix life/risk

compliance/financial-planning/life-insurance/

29 October 2015
| By Mike |
image
image image
expand image

Australia's major life insurers have a significant financial incentive to fix problems in the sector because if the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) were to emulate its UK regulatory counterpart, the industry could be faced with a remediation bill of over $1 billion over 10 years.

That is the assessment of KPMG Global Insurance Risk and Regulatory Lead, Rob Curtis who has used a forthcoming column in Money Management to point to the UK experience and warn that the potential financial implications for the Australian industry may be as significant as they have been for other jurisdictions.

"The roots of regulatory intervention and action in relation to conduct risk can be traced to the UK where a series of widely publicised mis-selling scandals, and the associated impact upon consumers and the industry, drove the regulator to take a more interventionist approach," he said.

"Approximately £20 billion has now been paid to customers in the form of redress in relation to payment protection insurance, which demonstrates the widespread financial impact upon firms and the scale of the impact upon consumers. In the UK, for every £1 spent on up-front compliance, up to £16 has been spent on remediation."

Curtis writes for Money Management that, in an Australian context, if ASIC was to take a similar approach, this would potentially result in potential remediation costs to the industry annually in the range of $125 million or approximately $1.25 billion for the same 10-year period as experienced by UK insurers.

Curtis said that the use of add-on premium options to existing insurance coverage had been another area that had come under increasing focus by UK regulators and was now also being examined by ASIC.

"The UK Financial Conduct Authority has levied heavy fines on some insurers for inappropriate use of such practises. The cost of redress has been approximately $40 per customer — which would result in a substantial capital provision if ASIC were to apply similar fines to Australian insurers," he said.

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 2 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 1 week ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 2 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

2 weeks 4 days ago

The Reserve Bank of Australia has announced its latest interest rate decision following this week's monetary policy meeting....

3 weeks 6 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo