Insurance policies at risk

insurance/superannuation-fund/genesys-wealth-advisers/life-insurance/government/

20 July 2007
| By Sara Rich |

Insurance companies are mounting a last ditch effort to contact large numbers of Australians who are unaware their superannuation-related risk policies are on the verge of lapsing.

Under the new ‘simpler super’ rules, super funds cannot accept non-concessional (personal) contributions if the member has not quoted a valid Tax File Number (TFN). This will affect the non-concessional payment of insurance premiums, and, ultimately, if premiums are not paid the insurance policy within that superannuation fund could lapse.

Similarly, without a TFN concessional (employer) contributions are taxed at a rate of 46.5 per cent, which might not leave enough to fund an insurance premium either.

In the lead up to the legislation’s July 1 implementation, Tower Australia flagged this rule change as one of the most important issues facing clients.

“It’s quite a big issue, especially where people [have insurance] in an existing fund and their health isn’t that great. It’s not as if they can just go and get a new policy out, so they really need to take care of the policy they have,” Tower superannuation marketing specialist Carly O’Keefe said.

As such, the insurer embarked on a massive communication drive involving letters, phone calls and e-mails to clients to urge them to lodge their TFN.

ING Life Risk head of marketing and retail products Mark Vilo said ING adopted similar measures in contacting clients.

“From our perspective, we took a decision to get in touch with all the clients we had within our portfolios to make sure they were aware of the situation.”

While both insurers have reported good response levels, they said there was still a substantial number of people who had not provided a TFN.

Genesys Wealth Advisers authorised representative and member firm principal Michael MacQuillan was appalled to discover one of his clients, who has held an ING insurance policy for more than 20 years, faced this situation.

“I would have thought the Government could have looked at this in a little more sensible manner, after all, this is a problem of the Government’s making — it is not something that the life insurance industry created, nor is it something advisers should be responsible for,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

5 days 14 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo