AFA welcomes exclusion of insurance from IFSA charter

AFA/afa-chief-executive/commissions/fee-for-service/financial-services-association/insurance/financial-advisers/life-insurance/financial-planning-association/IFSA/association-of-financial-advisers/chief-executive/

18 June 2009
| By Liam Egan |

The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has welcomed the exclusion of insurance from the Investment and Financial Services Association’s (IFSA's) new superannuation charter.

“Our members will be pleased that IFSA considers life insurance as a different class of product within super, with its own specific requirements, and therefore out of the scope of the charter," AFA chief executive Richard Klipin said.

“Insurance does play a part in super but, unlike super, it is not a mandatory product, and the client has the right to buy or not buy insurance, to not pay the premium or to pay the premium.

“The charter is instead trying to address the mandated nature of super, about which the Australian community does not have a choice, to provide a framework for the industry to go forward in an orderly approach."

Klipin said the IFSA charter’s broader fee-for-service requirement within super would be a non-issue “for some of AFA members, who have been well down that path for some time".

However, he said other AFA members who run a commission model in super are obviously going to have to adjust and transition to accommodate the requirements of the charter.

“In terms of the IFSA charter, which is effective from July 1 next year, IFSA members who offer super products will need to have products that comply with this charter.

“This means that advisers who advise on any of those products of IFSA members won’t have any other choice but to adjust to the charter, because they act as distributors of these products in an advice sense.”

He refused to comment on whether he saw the exclusion of insurance from the charter as a justification for the AFA’s opposition to the Financial Planning Association's (FPA's) plan to phase out commissions.

The AFA had responded to the plan by saying that its members did not want or expect their professional body to tell them how to run their businesses.

The FPA then criticised the AFA’s stance, calling it short-sighted and an attempt to recruit advisers who disagreed with the FPA’s new guidelines.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 months 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

4 months 1 week ago

AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity. ...

5 days 6 hours ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest financial adviser exam, held in November 2025....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo