Emulation funds fail to prove short-term benefit
Despite the promise of lower costs, emulation funds have little benefit over their more liquid counterparts in the short term, research shows.
The specialised funds are designed to reduce trading activity and as a result, lower costs for fund managers.
But the gain in cost-saving is often offset by the opportunity cost of short-term trading profits, according to the Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre (CMCRC), which tracked the funds over four years.
“One of the biggest pitfalls of emulation is that it fails to exploit the short-lived information value of the original trade signal,” Zhe Chen, CMCRC PhD Candidate from the Macquarie Graduate School of Management said.
“This leads to significant losses that appear to outweigh the benefits of reduced transaction costs.”
However, the research found emulation funds could be more beneficial given a longer lag, with the gains from lower transaction costs more likely to amount to real savings over an extended period of time.
Recommended for you
The CEO of L1 Group, formerly known as Platinum Asset Management, has stepped down with immediate effect, and the asset manager has announced his replacement.
Private equity manager Scarcity Partners has backed a specialist investment manager focused on metals and mining, seeking to meet investor demand for real assets.
UK fund manager Aberdeen Investments has launched an emerging market equity strategy for Australian investors, broadening the reach of an existing strategy.
Passive ETFs are seeing stronger flows than their active counterparts despite the proliferation of active launches this year, according to Morningstar.
