Emulation funds fail to prove short-term benefit
Despite the promise of lower costs, emulation funds have little benefit over their more liquid counterparts in the short term, research shows.
The specialised funds are designed to reduce trading activity and as a result, lower costs for fund managers.
But the gain in cost-saving is often offset by the opportunity cost of short-term trading profits, according to the Capital Markets Cooperative Research Centre (CMCRC), which tracked the funds over four years.
“One of the biggest pitfalls of emulation is that it fails to exploit the short-lived information value of the original trade signal,” Zhe Chen, CMCRC PhD Candidate from the Macquarie Graduate School of Management said.
“This leads to significant losses that appear to outweigh the benefits of reduced transaction costs.”
However, the research found emulation funds could be more beneficial given a longer lag, with the gains from lower transaction costs more likely to amount to real savings over an extended period of time.
Recommended for you
Two former senior Global X employees have launched their own ETF provider, ETF Shares, focused on offering index ETFs for advisers and retail investors.
With GCQ Funds Management and Lakehouse Capital making their recent ETF debuts, the two fund managers unpack why financial advisers are essential to their respective launches.
ETF provider Global X is set to launch its latest ETF, focused on artificial intelligence infrastructure.
Index provider MSCI has unveiled two measures to make it easier for financial advisers and wealth managers to access transparent insights into private assets.
