Call to rebalance hedge fund outperformance fee structures

hedge fund funds management financial crisis

2 May 2012
| By Staff |
image
image
expand image

New research from Towers Watson suggests a better model for aligned fee structures should come from a more equitable split between investors and hedge fund managers of skilled outperformance.

The research argued history has favoured hedge fund managers, in many cases, giving them the lion's share of the fees.

Towers Watson senior investment consultant Ross Barry said limited capacity had led to rising hedge fund fees and structures that "skewed the alignment between investors and managers".

Barry said that while Towers Watson advocated reward for manager skill, Most Favoured Nation Causes had become an excuse not to offer concessions, and there was a reasonable argument for the balanced split.

"Managers share profits, but there is often no mechanism for them to share losses so there is an incentive to take excessive risk rather than targeting high long-term returns."

Barry said the financial crisis had left many investors with considerable negotiating power and the 2+20 model - a two per cent management fee plus 20 per cent outperformance fees - coming under increasing pressure. 

But managers were also more responsive to engaging in discussions with investors on fees and terms, with some moving towards better balanced structures, he said.

"Hedge fund managers should be compensated for their skill and not for delivering market returns. The separation of these two elements is complex, but in our view worth analysing in detail," he said.

The research found that well-aligned structures also have management fees that reflect the position of the business rather than assets under management.

Well-aligned structures provide appropriate hurdle rates, loss carry-forward positions, extension of the performance fee calculation period, clawback provisions and reasonable pass-through expenses, according to Towers Watson.

Barry said transparency was still an issue, with many fee concessions coming at the cost of reduced liquidity, generally in the form of an initial lock-up period.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Big Feller

This can't be a surprising development. I'm sure every Financial Planner in Australia has had an experience of being sc...

16 hours ago
One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

21 hours 18 minutes ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

3 days 15 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND