ASIC disappointed by review of property scheme disclosure

ASIC/property/disclosure/self-managed-superannuation-funds/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/real-estate/

23 July 2014
| By Nicholas |
image
image image
expand image

A review of disclosure to investors by the unlisted property industry has been described as "disappointing" by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC).

ASIC commissioner, Greg Tanzer, said the results of the review, which was part of a broader surveillance into the managed investment and superannuation sectors, found unlisted property schemes were failing to adequately disclose against benchmarks put in place to improve investors' awareness of the risks related to investing in their products.

"The results are disappointing especially when, at a time in the rise of self-managed superannuation funds, many Australians are looking to invest in real estate," he said.

"Property schemes have become popular investment vehicles for such people, but they do carry risks as well as opportunities.

"When schemes aren't adequately disclosing those risks, investors are put in a vulnerable position."

ASIC's review found schemes' responsible entities either failed to address certain benchmarks or did not provide enough information. They also failed to provide the information in a single location on their website and/or in a single designated document.

"While we are disappointed at the quality of the disclosure against the ASIC benchmarks, it was helpful to observe that the levels of leverage in the sample we reviewed appeared manageable," Tanzer said.

ASIC revealed that one scheme withdrew its Product Disclosure Statement from the market as a direct result of the regulator's surveillance, while three entities are set to be questioned about their disclosure.

"Schemes need to address each and every disclosure element in each benchmark and disclosure principle fully," Tanzer said. "Where we find entities haven't satisfactorily addressed benchmarks or disclosure principles, we may consider taking enforcement action.

"A consistent approach should be taken when disclosing information. Entities should maintain a single stand-alone document, available in print or in an electronic form that represents to investors communication efficiency and cost effectiveness.

"ASIC will engage with the sector so that these issues are addressed."

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 month 3 weeks ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

2 months 2 weeks ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

2 months 3 weeks ago

ASIC has canceled the AFSL of Sydney-based asset consultant and research firm....

3 weeks 3 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser for eight years over false and misleading statements regarding clients’ superannuation investments....

1 week 5 days ago

ASIC has banned a Melbourne-based financial adviser who gave inappropriate advice to his clients including false and misleading Statements of Advice....

1 week 3 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo