Zurich finds some Better Super rules falling short
Remaining complexity in superannuation rules following last year’s Better Super reforms is causing retirement and estate planning difficulties and is also unfair on some people, according to wealth manager Zurich.
In a new report white paper, ‘Death and taxes are certain — super still confounds’, Zurich said there are several anomalies in the current super rules that deserve urgent review by the Government.
Technical services manager Dimitri Diamantes, author of the white paper, said a key problem with the current rules is that tax on super death benefits is a “source of complexity and unfairness”.
“If people don’t fit into certain types of beneficiary groups — namely a member’s spouse, a child of any age, interdependent or financially independent — a death benefit can only be paid to them via that member’s estate.
“Adult children, for example, are not entitled to receive the death benefit of a member as an income stream, while a financially dependant nephew can,” he said.
Other anomalies requiring government review relate to the treatment of anti-detriment payments and entitlements, death benefits containing insurance proceeds, and differential tax treatment, he said.
Recommended for you
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
