Zurich finds some Better Super rules falling short
Remaining complexity in superannuation rules following last year’s Better Super reforms is causing retirement and estate planning difficulties and is also unfair on some people, according to wealth manager Zurich.
In a new report white paper, ‘Death and taxes are certain — super still confounds’, Zurich said there are several anomalies in the current super rules that deserve urgent review by the Government.
Technical services manager Dimitri Diamantes, author of the white paper, said a key problem with the current rules is that tax on super death benefits is a “source of complexity and unfairness”.
“If people don’t fit into certain types of beneficiary groups — namely a member’s spouse, a child of any age, interdependent or financially independent — a death benefit can only be paid to them via that member’s estate.
“Adult children, for example, are not entitled to receive the death benefit of a member as an income stream, while a financially dependant nephew can,” he said.
Other anomalies requiring government review relate to the treatment of anti-detriment payments and entitlements, death benefits containing insurance proceeds, and differential tax treatment, he said.
Recommended for you
Compared to four years ago when the divide between boutique and large licensees were largely equal, adviser movements have seen this trend shift in light of new licensees commencing.
As ongoing market uncertainty sees advisers look beyond traditional equity exposure, Fidante has found adviser interest in small caps and emerging markets for portfolio returns has almost doubled since April.
CoreData has shared the top areas of demand for cryptocurrency advice but finds investors are seeking advisers who actively invest in the asset themselves.
With regulators ‘raising the bar’ on retirement planning, Lonsec Research and Ratings has urged advisers to place greater focus on sequencing and longevity risk as they navigate clients through the shifting landscape.
