Why NAB and Westpac are right on wealth management

NAB wealth management westpac banks

11 May 2016
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Banking groups such as National Australia Bank (NAB) and Westpac which have kept their wealth management businesses as separate entities have fared better than those which kept them in-house, according to a recent academic review of the banking sector.

The review authored by Adjunct Lecturer in Finance at the Sydney Business School — University of Wollongong and founder of management consultancy Agape International, Shantha Yahanpath, has examined the profitability of the major banks and the influence of their wealth management divisions and has concluded that their returns have probably fallen below shareholder expectations.

However it also argues that the banks would be foolish to withdraw from the arena in circumstances where wealth management will continue to be a growth sector on the back of an increasingly financially savvy ageing population.

The review said that while the foray into wealth management by banks had the potential to increase shareholder returns, "thus far the results have been mixed. The increase in revenue has been mainly due to economic cycle driven asset growth".

It said effective strategies to lighten the regulatory burden would help in increasing shareholder returns from wealth management.

However in dealing with the relative success of the various wealth management strategies, the review concluded that "it varies among banks depending on the chosen strategy".

"It appears that integration of wealth management into banks has not been as successful as keeping the wealth management division as a separate entity," it said.

"For example, CBA with their integration strategy appears to have not performed well in the wealth management sector. In contrast, Westpac, and NAB in particular have benefitted from keeping the wealth management divisions separate."

"With regards to the question of early entry of NAB into wealth management by acquiring MLC appears to have given them a first mover advantage but late entry by Westpac by acquiring BT Financial Group has not deterred them from making headway in wealth management," the review said.

"ANZ as a late entrant has also performed reasonably well. Therefore it is not the timing of or the time in the wealth management sector but the strategies crafted and implemented appear to be the key to the success."

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

One foot out the door

Just 15 per cent of advisers said they may exit the industry over the next few years, Thats about 2,300 advisers! if ...

3 hours ago
Craig Offenhauser

I think Mr. Toohey's conclusions and extrapolations are "currently" merging on the typical SMSF issue of "....prone to ...

2 days 21 hours ago
Random

What happened to the 700,000 million of MLC if $1.2 Billion was migrated to Expand but Expand had only 512 Million in in...

4 days 2 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 2 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND