Why fee-for-service won’t work for risk advisers
A doctor-style fee-for-service model for all advice, including life insurance, would create unsustainability in the financial planning sector and prevent specialisation, a former adviser believes.
Recently, Industry Super Australia's put forward a proposal to the Senate Economic Committee's inquiry into the Scrutiny of Financial Advice for planners to be "paid by doctors", with commission-based incentives to be removed on all advice, including life insurance.
Retired Newcastle-based adviser, Graham Poole, took umbrage at the suggestion and said it would see risk adviser-specialisation decline and underinsurance spiral.
He said in the NSW city of Newcastle, he saw risk specialisation fall from the hundreds to "just a handful" in the time he was practising.
"People who go to doctors are generally sick and go willingly…. Having sold life insurance for 40 years, I can say nobody rushes out to buy it… The adviser spends an inordinate amount of time looking for new clients," he said.
"I don't know how it can be compared to doctors."
Poole said the consequence of removal all incentives would be a loss of interest from advisers in selling life insurance, which could have devastating impacts for the wider community, he said.
Recommended for you
Centrepoint Alliance has overtaken Count as the second largest AFSL with more advisers in the pipeline and strong EBITDA growth predictions for FY2026.
ASIC has released an update to its regulatory guidance on managing conflicts of interest for financial services businesses on the back of its primate markets surveillance.
Sequoia Financial Group has flagged a series of non-cash impairments for the first half of FY26, citing exposure to Shield and First Guardian and provisions for potential professional indemnity insurance claims.
The Australian Wealth Advisors Group has completed two strategic investments, doubling its number of authorised representatives and increasing its FUMA by more than $1 million.
