Why fee-for-service won’t work for risk advisers
A doctor-style fee-for-service model for all advice, including life insurance, would create unsustainability in the financial planning sector and prevent specialisation, a former adviser believes.
Recently, Industry Super Australia's put forward a proposal to the Senate Economic Committee's inquiry into the Scrutiny of Financial Advice for planners to be "paid by doctors", with commission-based incentives to be removed on all advice, including life insurance.
Retired Newcastle-based adviser, Graham Poole, took umbrage at the suggestion and said it would see risk adviser-specialisation decline and underinsurance spiral.
He said in the NSW city of Newcastle, he saw risk specialisation fall from the hundreds to "just a handful" in the time he was practising.
"People who go to doctors are generally sick and go willingly…. Having sold life insurance for 40 years, I can say nobody rushes out to buy it… The adviser spends an inordinate amount of time looking for new clients," he said.
"I don't know how it can be compared to doctors."
Poole said the consequence of removal all incentives would be a loss of interest from advisers in selling life insurance, which could have devastating impacts for the wider community, he said.
Recommended for you
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
