Westpac/BT: we’ve made some errors

17 October 2002
| By Anonymous (not verified) |

With thebenefit of 20/20 hindsight, Westpac’s buyout of BT Funds Management would have been handled differently, according to Westpac’s group executive of wealth management David Clarke.

After a week during which BT Funds Management dropped fees on its flagship BT Australian Share Fund in an attempt to quell outflows from the group and announced the appointment of US-based Putnam Investments to manage its $5 billion international share portfolio, the team responsible for settling down the acquisition was looking to reassure financial planning groups.

Clarke and BT executive vice-present Rob Coombe toldMoney Managementthat the transition of BT into the Westpac fold was well under control and that the project team was within two weeks of delivering the final shape.

They also suggest the appointment of Putnam had provided “a lot of clarity” for analysts and investors on the direction in which the group was headed.

The bottom line message delivered by Clarke and Coombe was that most of the critical assessments which had resulted in BT’s Australian equities funds losing between $5 million and $8 million a day since the Westpac buy-out, had failed to fully appreciate the level of commitment and planning involved.

Clarke says such assessments had failed to recognise the depth of management talent which existed.

The assessments had also failed to recognise that while Westpac was fully committed to ensuring the success of the buyout, BT Funds Management and Sagitta Rothschild would remain discrete enterprises and be managed as such.

Clarke acknowledges that the majority of the problems and negativity which had been encountered since the buyout had been the result of uncertainty, particularly with respect to who would be managing the international share portfolio, the style of portfolios which would come out of the merged entity and the ongoing relationship with independent financial advisers.

When asked what he would change if Westpac were to undertake the exercise all over again, Clarke says that he would seek to communicate more clearly with financial planning groups.

“We had a week to 10 days immediately after the announcement when we could have been more clear with advisory groups and communicated more effectively,” Clarke says.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Greg

I have passed this exam, and it is not easy or fair exam. It's no wonder that advisers are falsifying their results. ...

2 days 19 hours ago
Ralph

How did the licensee not check this - they should be held to task over it. Obviously they are not making sure their sta...

2 days 21 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

Faking exams and falsifying results..... Too stupid to comment on JG...

2 days 22 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 3 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND