Wealth management margins face significant squeeze
Major investment bank UBS has lowered its earnings expectations on AMP Limited and rated IOOF as a “sell” in a harshly pragmatic assessment of the current state of the Australian wealth management industry, including a prediction that platform profits could decline by as much as 30 per cent.
The assessment, contained in a market report issued this week, has made clear the company’s belief that recent efforts by platforms in terms of cutting fees may not be enough.
“Successive recent admin fee cuts from the major providers are in our view a band aid solution,” the report said. “They may ease outflows, however these moves could ultimately exacerbate Legacy/Contemporary shifts and revenue pressures”
“Even if major wealth managers undertake radical cost surgery, platform earnings could decline more than 30 per cent from here,” the report said while confirming the firm had lowered its earnings assessment for AMP and IOOF to reflect this pressure and rated IOOF as a “sell”.
Backing its gloomy assessment of fee margins, the report said the company had reviewed over 130 product disclosure statements (PDSs), mapping fees across $660 billion of funds under management, representing more than 95 per cent of the major and speciality platform providers.
“We estimate major wealth management fee margins could drop by around 40 per cent over five years if contemporary fees fall to 30 basis points and legacy outflows accelerate” it said.
The report also forecast sharp profit reductions in wealth management, even if cost bases were cut by 20 per cent.
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
