Warning over UK pension mis-selling
Australianfinancial advisers have been warned they risk exposure to charges of mis-selling and consequent legal action if they underestimate or fail to address the complexities of providing advice on pension transfers from the United Kingdom.
UK-based financial planning company Montfort International, which specialises in providing international pension extraction services, has pointed to UK financial advisers currently facing mis-selling litigation and has warned that Australian advisers risk being similarly embroiled.
In a number of instances the litigation has resulted from British retirees being confronted by large tax bills because of the failure of UK advisers to fully inform clients of all the implications relating to international pension transfers.
“If Australian advisers have been involved and, having done their due diligence, have failed to pick up the mistakes or misinterpretations, then they may also find themselves the subject of litigation,” Montfort’s Geraint Davies says.
The scale of the problem has been growing because of the upsurge in British retirees migrating to Australia attracted by a favourable exchange rate and beneficial taxation arrangements.
Commenting on recent Senate recommendations in Australia suggesting the extension of the transfer period from the existing six months to two years, Davies says this was helpful but will give rise to new issues and complexities.
Those issues include exchange rates and timing, in circumstances where it was possible to adopt advantageous currency positions within the proposed two-year timeframe.
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
