Tower compensates customers for $1m error
Thanks to another administrative mishap, Tower Limited has been ordered by the corporate regulator to give $1 million back to customers whom it accidentally overcharged and underpaid.
Tower notified the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) of the errors last May after it discovered about 3000 clients in the now terminated Tower Superb Master Trust had been charged incorrect fees and had not received capital gains tax benefits.
ASIC yesterday ordered the trans-Tasman insurer and wealth manager to compensate affected investors and appoint an independent consultant to oversee the process.
This is the second time Tower has had to present an enforceable undertaking to ASIC, having made similar administrative errors last December when policy holders were overcharged approximately $4.9 million.
Although ASIC has expressed some disappointment with Tower, it has also praised it for coming forward so quickly and has stated that there is no need for the company’s customers to be alarmed.
Tower chief executive of risk David Callander said the errors were discovered as part of a review of administrative systems.
“We’ve been doing a bit of a tidy up of our business over the last couple of years. All our super policies are a lot more complex these days so we’ve deliberately gone through and looked at everything. We discovered this [error] in about May last year and we basically talked to ASIC and APRA [Australian Prudential regulation Authority] immediately after we thought there was a possible problem.”
Callander said he was confident Tower’s systems were now clean.
Several other financial services companies have experienced similar problems to Tower, including MLC, which had to reimburse customers $60 million after unit pricing errors, and AMP, which repaid $90 million to customers after administrative errors early last year.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
