Suncorp looks past NRMA for alliance

insurance/chief-executive/

31 August 2000
| By Kate Kachor |

The proposed back-office alliance between Suncorp Metway and newly-listed NRMA Insurance Group has come to a halt, with the Suncorp choosing to look elsewhere.

The proposed back-office alliance between Suncorp Metway and newly-listed NRMA Insurance Group has come to a halt, with the Suncorp choosing to look elsewhere.

Suncorp Metway chief executive Steve Jones says there has been much speculation over an alli-ance between the groups to merge their back-office operations.

Speaking after the Queensland-based group unveiled a 36 per cent increase in net profit to $335 million Jones confirmed that his group was not pursuing the NRMA offer, but instead was look-ing for other acquisitions.

“We have been looking for the last year and will continue to look at any acquisition opportu-nity,” he says.

“But it is not in our commercial interest to comment on any of those that might be underway or in prospect, but we're very keen in that regard.”

Jones says the group was looking for acquisitions to add products or put the group in new geo-graphical territory, however there was hardly any acquisition opportunities around.

“When you look through the banking market and general insurance market it is a fairly short list,” he says

“But there are a number of large overseas players that have Australian operations if any of them should decide to divest we'd be keen to talk.”

Jones says the successful completion of the last of the group's transformation programs in the first quarter of the financial year had significantly improved the company's operations and built a competitive cost base.

He says the period of cost savings growing earnings was behind the company after the company has completed full integration of the companies which merged to form Suncorp Metway in 1996.

The cost savings, of about $180 million a year, have come as a result of the completed merger between Suncorp, Metway and QIDC.

Operating expenses during the year to June 30, 2000, fell $57 million, from $602 million to $545 million, mainly due to a reduction in one-off costs associated with company's internal restruc-turing programs.

Jones says any increase in costs, should they arise, would be due to investments in expansion.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

5 days 10 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks 1 day ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks 1 day ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo