Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Sue Merriman: Making your final bequest

advisers/financial-planners/bt-financial-group/

21 November 2005
| By Larissa Tuohy |

According to Sue Merriman, BT Financial Group’s head of technical, more advisers need to be aware of the importance of beneficiary nominations when creating estate plans for clients.

Speaking on retirement income streams, and in particular allocated pensions and term allocated pensions, Merriman will offer advice on what financial planners should consider when helping clients make their nominations for who will receive benefits when they die.

“Under the law, there are about four different ways in which you can make a nomination, but not all products provide that full range,” she says.

“I think that advisers, some advisers anyway, haven’t quite caught up with the fact that they are actually quite important decisions to make because there can be different tax and RBL [reasonable benefit limit] and social security consequences depending on what happens ... this is about looking after their beneficiaries.”

For instance, Merriman says that where a pension is fully excessive in the original member’s hands, it may be possible for a spouse to commute and roll over the funds, so they receive a non-excessive pension and therefore pay less tax.

In addition, Merriman says she is not sure that all advisers are aware of the rules governing dependant children.

Under the Superannuation Industry Supervision (SIS) Act, adult children are still regarded as dependants.

However, under the Tax Act, adult children are not considered dependant for tax purposes.

She says: “So if they take the benefit as a lump sum, there’s going to be some tax payable. But if they took the benefit as a continuing pension, there’s no difference when you’re taxing a pension whether the person’s a dependant for tax purposes or a non-dependant for tax purposes.

“Now, whether people want to have death benefits in the form of a pension is another matter, but at least you should try to keep that option open for beneficiaries in case that’s the way they want to go.”

As nominations must be made before a client dies, it is crucial that advisers discuss who the beneficiaries will be, and how the benefits should be paid.

“It’s a question of what sort of nomination you make, so that you’ve got flexibility if you need it in terms of the form of the benefit, but then perhaps not flexibility in terms of who gets the benefit,” Merriman explains.

“So you may also want to look at binding nominations to make sure that the right person gets the money.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 1 day ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

While the profession continues to see consolidation at the top, Adviser Ratings has compared the business models of Insignia and Entireti and how they are shaping the pro...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND