Structured products disclosure under scrutiny
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) has updated its disclosure guidance for capital protected products and retail structured or derivative products marketed to retail investors.
The report is a result of a program started by ASIC in January 2009 and has involved the review of 64 Product Disclosure Statements for adequacy of disclosure.
In its review, ASIC focused on capital protected products as it believed investors might be attracted to these investments due to a perception of capital safety without fully comprehending the inherent risks. It also examined structured and derivative products marketed to retail investors where associated risks and costs might not be anticipated or understood.
Following the review, ASIC has made recommendations that issuers of these products should make more effective disclosure to prospective investors by clearly explaining counterparty risk and by including supporting financial information to ensure retail investors can assess the issuer’s financial ability to meet its counterparty obligations.
Further recommendations saw issuers of capital protected products urged to ensure disclosure is sufficient so that investors can assess the likelihood of early termination or any other significant limitations of these products. It also stressed issuers provide better disclosure costs that may apply should an investor seek to terminate or redeem a product before its maturity date.
Recommended for you
Licensing regulation should prioritise consumer outcomes over institutional convenience, according to Assured Support, and the compliance firm has suggested an alternative framework to the “licensed and self-licensed” model.
The chair of the Platinum Capital listed investment company admits the vehicle “is at a crossroads” in its 31-year history, with both L1 Capital and Wilson Asset Management bidding to take over its investment management.
AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies.
With a large group of advisers expecting to exit before the 2026 education deadline, an industry expert shares how these practices can best prepare themselves for sale to compete in a “buyer’s market”.
