S&P defends product-paid model
Research house Standard & Poor's (S&P) has defended its manufacturer-pays model, saying it increases transparency at a number of levels, despite acknowledging it leaves the research house beholden to the wishes of product manufacturers.
In a white paper examining the three most common business models used by Australian investment research houses, S&P said its model creates transparency and a wide dissemination of information.
S&P said the manufacturer-pays model allows fund ratings to be provided to all investors for free, leading to "education of the marketplace, [which] is necessary to avoid potential misuse of fund ratings".
The research house also said the manufacturer-pays model allows it greater access to information relating to fund managers, "because fund managers have initiated the engagement and are motivated to provide the highest levels of transparency".
However, this model can work in both directions, the research house acknowledged. For example, "when fund managers cease paying for fund ratings on certain funds due to changes in marketing strategy or unhappiness with the rating".
Recommended for you
With the final tally for FY25 now confirmed, how many advisers left during the financial year and how does it compare to the previous year?
HUB24 has appointed Matt Willis from Vanguard as an executive general manager of platform growth to strengthen the platform’s relationships with industry stakeholders.
Investment manager Drummond Capital Partners has announced a raft of adviser-focused updates, including a practice growth division, relaunched manager research capabilities, and a passive model portfolio suite.
When it comes to M&A activity, the share of financial buyers such as private equity firms in Australia fell from 67 per cent to 12 per cent in the last financial year.
