SoAs are alienating clients
Statements of advice (SoA) have become big, alienating, and defensive documents that are more likely to increase the anxiety of consumers who are accessing advice for the first time, according to a panel.
Speaking on the Financial Services Council’s (FSC) webinar on financial advice, the council’s policy manager for advice, Zach Castles, said SoAs bombarded people and created more anxiety for first-time advice users rather than reduce financial anxiety.
“We’ve got to look at ways of having a more scalable or improving that aspect of the process so that they feel needs are being met so that it is broken down so that consumers understand rather than serving up quite comprehensive paperwork that could be high quality but missed in quite fundamental consumer awareness,” Castles said.
Also on the panel, research consultancy Pollinate’s head of society, Pamela Souvlis, said consumers saw huge amounts of documentation as just fine print to help firms cover themselves.
“They don’t relate to a huge amount of documentation with trust – that’s the misconception,” she said.
“There’s two types of trust, there’s the confidence trust – is this person skilled, qualified, is there a professional and regulatory body behind them? And then there’s relational trust.
“Trust is a big bucket and a whole lot of documentation does not necessarily build that trust. There are probably better ways to get consumers to get a sense of trust and feel their backs are covered other than a whole lot of documentation. Frankly, most of it is hard to read and not clear.”
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
