Slater & Gordon files class action against GPT Group
Slater and Gordon has filed a representative proceeding against the GPT Group in the Federal Court of Australia (GPT), alleging that the company engaged in misleading and deceptive conduct.
According to the law firm, the claim has been brought on behalf of investors who acquired stapled securities between 27 February 2008 and 6 July 2008. Those investors proceeded to execute litigation funding agreements with Comprehensive Legal Funding LLC as at 7 December 2008.
Slater and Gordon practice group leader Ben Phi confirmed that the firm would be representing a "large number of institutional and retail investors that acquired stapled securities" during the aforementioned period, and proceedings were now underway "following a failed attempt to resolve the matter at mediation".
The claim alleged that GPT engaged in misleading conduct in relation to - and breached its continuous disclosure obligations following - the 2008 earnings and distribution guidance that accompanied the release of its 2007 Full Year Statutory Accounts.
The class action is now closed to new members, but Slater and Gordon stated that GPT investors who did not execute litigation funding agreements before 7 December 2008 can register their details on the firm's website.
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.
