Research confirms validity of risk commissions
The Association of Financial Advisers (AFA) has used new research results to urge the Federal Government not to abolish commission-based arrangements around advice relating to insurance products.
The research, released today, found that many Australians would not seek life insurance advice if they were forced to pay for it via an upfront fee rather than by commissions.
The research also suggested the Government’s proposed opt-in arrangements would act as an impediment.
The research, conducted by CoreData and sponsored by major insurer, AIA Australia, was based on a survey of corporate superannuation and life insurance clients and revealed that a commission paid by the insurance provider was the most common and preferred method of payment with respect to life insurance.
It found that strong evidence existed to support the contention that many people receiving life insurance advice in today’s environment would exit the market if forced to pay a fee for service.
Commenting on the results, AFA chief executive Richard Klipin (pictured) said it had revealed that people who used a financial adviser for their life insurance needs were more likely to have appropriate cover and be confident they understood what type of cover they had.
“Disturbingly, however, many would not pay for it if commissions are abolished,” he said.
“Ultimately, what these findings tell us is that the proposed Future of Financial Advice (FOFA) reforms around the possible banning of commissions on risk products and opt-in will, if implemented, have a devastating effect on ordinary Australians.”
“Fewer would get advice and even fewer would have life insurance,” Klipin said.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
