Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Reporting exemption puts employees at risk

ASFA/compliance/superannuation-funds/association-of-superannuation-funds/superannuation-guarantee/government/federal-government/

9 December 2004
| By Mike Taylor |

The Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia(ASFA) has warned the Federal Government that legislation exempting employers from reporting quarterly to employees on their compulsory superannuation contributions risks fundamentally undermining the new choice of fund regime.

In a submission to the Senate Economics Legislation Committee ASFA said the Tax Laws Amendment (Superannuation Reporting) Bill ran counter to the Government’s own promise to help employees monitor whether their employer was paying their superannuation.

“ASFA considers this move to be contradictory to the spirit of choice, which is supposed to be about giving employees more control over their super,” it said. “Passage of this bill will see many employees disadvantaged when choice of fund is introduced next year.”

The ASFA submission said that workers in the small business sector would be particularly disadvantaged because the Australian Tax Office (ATO) had previously indicated that the groups of employees most affected by employer non-compliance with the superannuation guarantee were contractors, part-time and casual employees, women and those employed in regional areas.

“At present, around 10,000 employees a year report to the ATO a possible non-payment of super by their employer or ex-employer,” the submission said. “It has been suggested that this is only the tip of the iceberg since many workers are unaware of their employer’s non-compliance.”

The submission said that ASFA is concerned that a number of employers will “find refuge for poor employment practices in the proposed reduction of obligations”.

“The Association does not see the imminent increase in employers’ obligations under choice of fund as a valid reason for abandoning the legislative reporting requirement and eroding the rights of employees,” the submission said. “Rather we see urgent need for the Government to provide information and education to employers on their obligations and the procedures they will have to follow under the choice regime.”

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 4 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 4 days ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

1 day 18 hours ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND