Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo
 
 

Regulatory issues at core of crisis

global-financial-crisis/mortgage/australian-securities-and-investments-commission/

2 March 2009
| By Amal Awad |

Regulatory imbalance is at the core of the current global financial crisis, according to a senior official with the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).

Adrian Blundell-Wignall, deputy director, financial enterprise affairs, with the OECD told the Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) summer school that four primary events in 2004 led to the financial crisis, although he acknowledged a number of other facilitating contributors.

The four issues Blundell-Wignall identified were the ‘American Dream’ mortgage policy signed into law in the US, the publication of the Basell II accord, which prompted change in banks looking towards 2008 when the regulations would come into effect, the US Securities Exchange Commission's (SEC's) regulatory changes for investment banks and the imposition of PFHEO Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac controls.

In particular, his focus was on regulatory issues, arguing, for example, that SEC rule changes in the US meant the leverage ratio in regulated banks overseas accelerated sharply after 2004.

Blundell-Wignall, who led a panel discussion on the causal factors for the current meltdown, crisis management and exit, acknowledged the role of the sub-prime crisis in the US, and also identified problems between principals (including taxpayers and shareholders) and agents (including the central banks and regulators). He said there was a macro issue of poor global financial architecture and, from a micro perspective, he pointed to the mixing of credit and equity culture.

Blundell-Wignall also discussed the issue of “toxic assets”, which he said “started to explode” after 2004.

“Toxic residential backed securities were parabolic after 2004,” he told the conference, adding that factors such as agency, business loans, common mortgages and consumer credit among other elements were facilitating, not causal.

Blundell-Wignall was critical of the Basell II accord, but did not elaborate on this during the session.

On an exit strategy, Blundell-Wignall highlighted the importance of crisis management and also said it was crucial to prevent increased damage to the market.

“Unfortunately new damage is being done and there’s a lot of it,” he said. “The more crisis measures are sustainable the more credible the market will see the overall approach to solving the crisis,” he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 2 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

2 days 1 hour ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 5 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 5 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND