Productivity Commission urges end to ‘general advice’
The Productivity Commission (PC) has backed calls to limit the use of the term ‘advice’ to professional financial adviser and for a renaming of ‘general advice’.
The PC’s draft report on Competition in the Australian Financial System, released today has urged the measure to “ensure consumers are able to clearly distinguish between general promotional effort related to products and actual personal advice”.
It said that use of the term ‘advice’ “should be limited to effort that is undertaken on a client’s behalf by a professional adviser”.
“Currently, the terminology of advice requires consumers to intuitively understand that general advice is like marketing; and personal advice is actually tailored to their situation and carries with it some protection against misuse,” the draft report said.
It said rebadging of existing ‘general advice’ products to implement this would involve some cost to the industry, but suggested that some documentation would be electronic and that most would be updated regularly and the marginal costs of the change would not be substantial.
“The important shift is to training in the use of this term (and the culture that accompanies it),” the draft report said.
The draft report has formally recommended that general advice, as defined in the Corporations Act 2001, is misleading and should be renamed.
“The Commission supports consumer testing of alternative terminology to ensure that misinterpretation and excessive reliance on this type of promotional information is minimised,” it said. “The term ‘advice’ should only be used in association with ‘personal advice’ that takes into consideration personal circumstances.”
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
