Planning practices employing tech-heads rather than experienced planners
Financial planning practices are employing ‘technologists’ rather than future financial planners as they battle to use advice software, according to one software provider.
Midwinter Financial Services general manager — strategy and technical services, Matthew Esler, said many planning practices are restricted by what he calls “incumbent and monolithic” financial planning software.
He believes this leads to the inefficient operation of some planning practices, and points to the recruitment of staff as one barometer.
Esler said the challenges advisers face in using planning software means it isn’t being used by “experienced (and older) financial advisers, but inexperienced (and younger) paraplanners and support staff”.
“Instead of employing future financial planners with the ability to understand the needs and objectives of the client, and the ability to sell that need back to the client, financial advice practices are forced to employ technologists,” Esler said.
He describes such technologists as “tech-savvy paraplanners and support staff with limited traditional financial planning ability”.
“Advisers need to ask themselves are they recruiting staff to build a business based on quality advice and relationships, or are they recruiting to mask inefficient technology,” Esler said.
He believes practices should focus on “recruiting staff with the traditional financial planning and people skills required to expand their business”.
Recommended for you
ASIC has issued infringement notices to two AFSLs over financial advisers providing personal advice while they were unregistered.
Australian retirees could increase their projected annual incomes by as much as 51 per cent through comprehensive financial advice, according to a Vanguard study, but cost continues to be an issue.
AMP has announced a senior appointment to its North leadership team, reinforcing the firm’s commitment to the advice industry.
Despite the financial adviser exam being rooted in ethics, two professional year advisers believe the lack of support and transparency from the regulator around the exam is unethical.
