Planners fail to access tax scheme settlement

financial-planners/taxation/ATO/FPA/

22 May 2002
| By Lachlan Gilbert |

TheFinancial Planning Association(FPA) has failed to convince theAustralian Taxation Office(ATO) that planners who advised clients to invest in mass marketed tax schemes should be entitled to the same settlement offer regarding the repayment of tax deductions.

The settlement offer, which was announced by the ATO in February, ruled that investors were required to hand back the tax deductions they received from investing in tax effective schemes, but were no longer required to pay penalties and interest on those deductions.

In a letter to the FPA, ATO first assistant commissioner Des Maloney rebuffed the Association’s arguments that financial planners should be considered in the same light as other tax payers when it came to the schemes.

The FPA had argued that advisers who had not been charged with any wrongdoing, and had invested their own monies in the schemes, should have the same access as other investors to the settlement offer.

“Your suggestion that the settlement terms for a particular taxpayer should be determined by whether or not the taxpayer has or has not been charged with any wrong doing by the licensing authority is, with respect, misplaced.”

Maloney says excluding financial planners “from automatic entitlement to the benefits of the mass marketed settlement offer” is in line with the September 2001 report of the Senate Economics References Committee.

The report stated that “investors will be deemed eligible unless they [are] tax advisers, financial planners and tax agents”.

The ATO also maintains its position of hearing financial planners requests to be included in the settlement terms only on a case-by-case basis, which it says is “consistent with the recommendation of the Senate Committee”.

But even then, financial planners will be expected to mount a strong case. All signals coming from the ATO indicate that it will exclude from the offer all planners who invested in the schemes themselves, but also profited by recommending the tax schemes to their clients.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

3 months 1 week ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

4 months ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

4 months 1 week ago

AMP has agreed in principle to settle an advice and insurance class action that commenced in 2020 related to historic commission payment activity. ...

5 days 13 hours ago

Advice firms are increasing their base salaries by as much as $50k to attract talent, particularly seeking advisers with a portable book of clients, but equity offerings ...

3 weeks 5 days ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest financial adviser exam, held in November 2025....

1 week 4 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
moneymanagement logo