Planners exposed by platform requirements

3 February 2015
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Financial planners who make recommendations to clients on the use of platforms may be inadvertently exposing themselves to breaching Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) guidance if they do not provide accurate information about the basis of their recommendation.

However the catch for the planners is that the platforms themselves are likely to be the only accurate source of the information required by ASIC Regulatory Guide 148 (RG 148) and a number of planners have told Money Management the platforms have not yet provided that information in easily usable form.

The issue was first raised during last year's Money Management Platforms and Wraps conference as being problematic for planners and their dealer groups, and a number of senior industry officials have warned that a number of platform providers have still not delivered the information required by planners.

RG 148 makes clear that platforms are a financial product and that, therefore, "opinions or recommendations intended to influence, or that could reasonably be regarded as intended to influence, a decision about using a platform will be financial product advice".

The regulatory guide then goes on to state that advisers providing opinions or recommendations with respect to platforms will need to meet their best interests duty and that ASIC expects that "advice given about platforms and investing through them will cover the key features of a platform, including how it is different from investing directly in the same financial products and/or securities, and the impact of matters listed in the consumer warning acknowledgement, requiring acknowledgement (or agreement in the case of electronic submission) by the client".

"We consider that advice about platforms and investing through them can be scaled. When providing advice on subject matter such as investing through platforms, it should be made clear in the Statement of Advice (SOA) what advice has been provided and what advice has not been provided (as relevant to the subject matter of the advice), the implications of this, and why that approach was taken. This is especially important in the context of determining whether a platform is an appropriate option for the client," the ASIC guide states.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Squeaky'21

My view is that after 2026 there will be quite a bit less than 10,000 'advisers' (investment advisers) and less than 100...

1 week 1 day ago
Jason Warlond

Dugald makes a great point that not everyone's definition of green is the same and gives a good example. Funds have bee...

1 week 1 day ago
Jasmin Jakupovic

How did they get the AFSL in the first place? Given the green light by ASIC. This is terrible example of ASIC's incompet...

1 week 2 days ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND