Patron opposes FSC's 'churn' proposals
Patron Financial Advice has opposed a Financial Services Council proposal to introduce a binding standard for insurance business, saying it would restrict consumer choice, unfairly penalise financial planners, and push them to the brink of survival.
Removing upfront commissions, extending responsibility periods, and removing or replacing policy terms, coupled with [Future of Financial Advice] compliance frameworks reforms, would be an onerous and costly cross to bear for all financial advisers, Patron general manager Robert McCann said in a statement.
"The life insurance industry is perfectly capable of weeding out any bad apples on its own merit," the statement read.
"Many consumers actually choose to replace their current risk policy with an improved product from the same provider, which should not be regarded as churn. Is consumer choice necessarily a bad thing?"
A sustainable industry can be achieved through further collaboration between life insurance companies and financial advisers rather than excessive third party micro management, McCann stated.
"To red flag the issue of retention, label it as 'churn' and then blame it on financial advisers is irresponsible and ill informed," McCann stated.
McCann could not be reached for comment due to annual leave. The FSC did not wish to comment.
Recommended for you
Licensee Centrepoint Alliance has completed the acquisition of Brighter Super’s annual review service advice book, via Financial Advice Matters.
ASIC has launched court proceedings against the responsible entity of three managed investment schemes with around 600 retail investors.
There is a gap in the market for Australian advisers to help individuals with succession planning as the country has been noted by Capital Group for being overly “hands off” around inheritances.
ASIC has cancelled the AFSL of an advice firm associated with Shield and First Guardian collapses, and permanently banned its responsible manager.
