Parliamentary Inquiry being questioned
The value of a Parliamentary Inquiry, the terms of reference of which appear to favour retail superannuation funds over their industry counterparts, is being questioned by the Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia (ASFA).
ASFA chief executive Philippa Smith said she found the calling of the inquiry, to be chaired by South Australian Liberal Senator Grant Chapman, puzzling in circumstances where most of the issues had already been extensively reviewed by other inquiries.
“The terms of reference for the inquiry seem somewhat odd when most of the issues have been dealt with elsewhere,” she said. “It represents a distraction when you consider that most funds are trying to bed down the changes announced in the Budget.”
The Parliamentary Inquiry has caused consternation in some quarters of the superannuation industry because its chairman, Senator Chapman, in 2004 used parliamentary privilege to accuse leading industry superannuation funds organisation Industry Fund Services (IFS) of a range of failings, including poor accounting standards and a lack of transparency — claims strenuously denied by IFS.
AUTHOR
Mike Taylor
Recommended for you
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
Amid the current financial adviser shortage, advice firm Link Wealth is looking to expand its financial literacy program for high school students across the country.
TAL Risk Academy has updated its range of ethics courses to help financial advisers meet their CPD requirements following adviser feedback, including interpreting FSCP determinations.
