Parallels between Trio and bank money laundering
The Victims of Financial Fraud (VOFF) group has drawn parallels between the recent money laundering investigations against the banks and the Trio Capital scheme, arguing the “scapegoating” and “victimisation” used against Trio cannot be repeated in the current money laundering cases.
In a statement, the group said there were discrepancies in the way the Anti-Money Laundering and Counter-Terrorism Financing (AML/CTF) Act was administered, and said it feared another double standard existed in the way financial fraud was investigated depending on whether the fraud was against ordinary citizens or the Commonwealth.
The group quoted a former AUSTRAC senior adviser, who said banks and other financial institutions that failed to conduct basic due diligence likely placed them in breach of “know your customer” requirements. The adviser also said a criminal could create a company and bounce all the money into one account and then send it offshore and walk away from the company.
VOFF asked why investors or superannuation account holders were not warned about weaknesses if authorities had known about the weak laws and questionable banking practices that enabled criminals to move millions of dollars through Australian banks.
“The allegations about the CBA’s ATM money transactions is a reminder of the Trio Capital
Limited scheme where a criminal gang took over a reputable funds management business and transferred investor’s money to destinations only known to the criminals,” the group said.
VOFF quoted the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Corporations and Financial Services Inquiry into the collapse of Trio Capital from May 2012, which said “the custodian (in Trio's case, the National Australia Bank) does very little to protect the funds of investors. It makes no independent checks before transferring money offshore. Instead, the custodian simply acts on the instructions of the responsible entity”.
“Seemingly the discrepancies in applying the AML/CTF Act and the admission about the weaknesses in the financial system would suggest it’s time the Trio victims receive an apology, compensation and be vindicated for the crime that financial regulatory agencies should have expected.”
AUTHOR
Malavika Santhebennur
Recommended for you
An FAAA recommendation to make PY advisers subject to non-compete clauses would place candidates in a “hostage situation” with their employer and potentially deter new entrants, say commentators.
While the profession struggles to keep up with strong consumer demand, a third of people who have passed the ASIC adviser exam aren’t actively practising, so where is this missing third?
Half a year after Count Financial told its advisers to exit several Metrics Credit Partners funds, research house Lonsec has now downgraded two of these products over governance concerns.
As the advice industry evolves with technology, two business consultants have said successful advice firms will be those which focus on delivering an “experience” for their clients, beyond just a transactional service.
