O’Dwyer wants rid of four-day adviser ‘cowboys’
The Minister for Revenue and Financial Services, Kelly O'Dwyer has confirmed that the minimum standard for people to be able to call themselves a financial adviser is just four days' worth of training.
Explaining the reasons behind the Government's legislation imposing higher education and ethical standards, O'Dwyer acknowledged that it was "true to say that the minimum standard within the sector is in fact four days' worth of training before you hang up your shingle".
As well, she said the higher standards would help eliminate "cowboys" from the financial planning industry.
"Currently it's four days, currently that is actually the requirement but we are changing it, we're changing it with the legislation that we've introduced," she said.
"We say you either need to have a degree or be degree equivalent, you need to have continuing education requirements, you need to make sure that you pass an exam that applies to absolutely everyone in the industry so we can get rid of those people in the industry who, for want of a better description, could be described as cowboys and not the right person that you should be talking to to get expert financial advice," O'Dwyer said.
"And we're introducing an ethics component as well, so that every single financial adviser needs to be providing advice in the best interest of the consumer rather than in their own financial interest," she said.
Recommended for you
With wealth management M&A appetite only growing stronger, Business Health has outlined the major considerations for buyers and sellers to prevent unintended misalignment between the parties.
Industry body SIAA has said the falling number of financial advisers in Australia is a key issue impacting the attractiveness and investor participation of both public and private markets.
As advisers risk losing two-thirds of FUA during the $3.5 trillion wealth transfer, two co-founders underscore why fostering trust with the next generation is vital to retaining intergenerational wealth.
As advisers seek greater insights into FSCP determinations, what are the various options considered by the panel and can a decision be appealed?
