MoneySmart wrong on cost of advice says AFA

23 March 2018
| By Mike |
image
image
expand image

Suggestions on the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC’s) MoneySmart website that simple advice can be as cheap as $200 to $700 significantly underestimates the real cost of financial advice, according to the Association of Financial Advisers (AFA).

The AFA has used its submission to the Productivity Commission’s (PC) inquiry into Competition in the Australian Financial System to argue that such statements have led to consumers being unwilling to pay the true cost of providing financial advice.

“We note the reference in the [PC’s] Draft Report to the comment on the MoneySmart website that simple advice could be as cheap as $200-$700,” the submission said. “When the full obligations of preparing financial advice are taken into consideration, this is inevitably significantly underestimating the real cost of financial advice.”

In doing so, it pointed out that ASIC had recently released their example Risk Insurance Statement of Advice (SoA), which it said was a document that included over 20 pages of carefully tailored material.

“Personal advice provided to a new retail client with respect to a superannuation, investment or insurance product, must in almost all circumstances be provided by the means of an SoA,” it said. “Before providing the advice, the financial adviser must undertake a fact-finding exercise to adequately understand the client’s needs, objectives and personal circumstances. They also need to undertake a number of other steps including researching product options that are appropriate for the client.”

“There is a significant amount of work involved in the provision of financial advice. As the Productivity Commission has pointed out, there is a lack of awareness by consumers of the cost of providing financial advice and along with other assumptions leads to a lack of willingness to pay for the true cost of financial advice,” the submission said.

The AFA argued that there was much work that needed to be done to better ensure that consumers were aware of the cost of financial advice and were also willing to pay for the true cost of high quality financial advice that was in their best interests.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

Avenue 17

I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are not right. I am assured. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM, we will communica...

14 hours ago
Robert Segue

Sounds like a schoolyard childish scrap! take it behind the shelter sheds and sort it out! Really Publicly listed compa...

1 day 14 hours ago
JOHN GILLIES

iN THE END IT IS THE REGULATORS FAULT. wHILE I WAS WORKING I WAS ALLWAYS AMAZED AT HOW UNTHINKING SOME CLIENTS WERE! I...

1 day 18 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

9 months 2 weeks ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 1 week ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

9 months 2 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND