Money laundering laws to slug managers with unfair costs

ifsa-chief-executive/fund-managers/funds-management-industry/compliance/IFSA/financial-services-association/chief-executive/

10 October 2003
| By Lucie Beaman |

Fundmanagers accepting deposits or funds from the public will be slugged with additional costs and increased compliance demands if new international due diligence guidelines are not amended, according to theInvestment and Financial Services Association(IFSA).

The guidelines come from the international body, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), of which Australia is a member. The FATF spearheads efforts to counter criminal use of financial systems and has revised a number of recommendations for combating money laundering and terrorist financing.

Under the new recommendations, fund managers — in addition to banks and operators of cash management trusts (CMT) — will be required to verify the identity of customers and perform ongoing monitoring of the purpose of the business relationship.

For cross-border transactions, fund managers will have to gain information about offshore groups and assess their anti-money laundering and terrorist financing controls, and require the approval of senior management to establish new relationships.

IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert says the current client identification system, which was developed for bank branch systems, will result in massive costs to the funds management industry if applied as is.

“The other [bank and CMT] system is not a technological system, and the question is: do branch banking structures meet everybody’s needs?

“We need a workable system that will not impose substantial additional costs on the industry — which could be in the order of tens of millions of dollars,” Gilbert says.

The ultimate loss, IFSA says, would be to the end client, who will suffer from increased management expense ratios (MER), and reduction in returns.

“There is no magic honey pot from which these expenses can be met — ultimately the MER is the headline outcome, and the industry is doing its best to reduce them. This could put pressure on MERs at the wrong time,” Gilbert says.

As they stand, the recommendations require due diligence to be performed on new and existing customers. Gilbert disagrees and says the requirements should only be applicable to new customers.

The revisions impact almost all Australian financial institutions, which FATF says “will need to adopt the new due diligence obligations recommended … to ensure they can operate in the global financial marketplace”.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 3 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

3 days 3 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

1 week 6 days ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

2 weeks 6 days ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo