Managers face billion dollar tempest
Nearly 60Australian fund managers have been set a July 18 deadline by the New Zealand Securities Commission to investigate possible breaches of regulations in filing documents for Australian Registered Managed Investment Schemes (ARMIS) in the country.
Any breach will void the fund or product in question and result in full repayment of funds to clients, plus 10 per cent interest a year from the date of subscription — a figure that could run into the billions.
The Commission has written to various fund managers afterBT Funds Managementin New Zealand revealed it may have breached statutory filing legislation under The Securities Act 1978 (NZ).
Australian managers have two compliance options for offering products in New Zealand. The first is a more expensive option involving the issue of a separate prospectus and appointment of a statutory supervisor. The second involves meeting the conditions of an exemption notice under The Securities Act 1978 and requires the filing of various documentation with the New Zealand Registrar of Companies.
The requisite paperwork includes providing a copy of the relevant Australian prospectus, evidence of the responsible entity’s Australian securities licence, the constitution of the product, evidence it is registered in Australia, and the compliance plan for the scheme to the registrar.
According to New Zealand Securities Commission associate counsel Kathryn Rogers, a letter was sent to investment managers on June 23 giving them four weeks to respond.
The commission wrote to those managers that are obliged to report to it each year as part of the exemption notice for ARMIS, as these will be the managers if any that are in breach, Rogers says.
Money Managementcontacted a number of fund managers, however, none would comment beyond the fact it was a matter being looked into by their legal and compliance officers.
A hearing relating to BT NZ’s alleged breaches is scheduled for the Wellington High Court on July 27.
“[However] it may not actually be called on that day because it’s been scheduled for a master of the High Court but it may be rescheduled for a judge,” says court appointed legal firm Lowndes Jordan partner, Graham Jordan.
“The initial proceedings are to determine what classes of investors there are and whether there are different groups with different interests.”
On the likely time frame for concluding proceedings on the matter, Jordan adds, “it’s a long way away, unfortunately”.
Recommended for you
The top five licensees are demonstrating a “strong recovery” from losses in the first half of the year, and the gap is narrowing between their respective adviser numbers.
With many advisers preparing to retire or sell up, business advisory firm Business Health believes advisers need to take a proactive approach to informing their clients of succession plans.
Retirement commentators have flagged that almost a third of Australians over 50 are unprepared for the longevity of retirement and are falling behind APAC peers in their preparations and advice engagement.
As private markets continue to garner investor interest, Netwealth’s series of private market reports have revealed how much advisers and wealth managers are allocating, as well as a growing attraction to evergreen funds.
