LITO crackdown hurts legitimate users
A reduction in the low-income tax offset (LITO) for minors will have the desired effect of reducing tax reduction strategies for family trusts, but could also disadvantage non-wealthy families, according to Chan & Naylor director Ken Raiss.
Previously minors had the capacity to earn a maximum tax-free income of $3,333 per year, which also meant within a family trust situation income could be distributed to minors to reduce the tax paid by parents or other family members.
But people were using the LITO to assist their children, especially in rural areas and farming families and instances of family breakdowns, Raiss said.
“I would’ve thought even children have a right to get what everyone else gets,” he said.
“There was the ability for everyone to access a low-income tax offset now they’ve taken away from children who can’t defend themselves.”
It was a justifiable cash flow structure, but the Government has seen it as a rort, and has only looked at the surface issue rather than the underlying issue, he said.
The move shows that the Government still misunderstands and mistrusts trust mechanisms, according to Chan & Naylor.
Rather than just being the domain of the rich, they are a legitimate tool used by small businesses for asset protection and estate planning and offer legitimate tax benefits, the firm stated.
Recommended for you
The director of Ascent Investment and Coaching, Michael Dunjey, has been charged with 33 criminal offences.
Adviser Ratings’ latest financial landscape report finds there is a demographic of advice practices achieving an average revenue of $5 million, with only 3 per cent of practices overall seeing a revenue decline.
The FAAA is calling for regulators to take a partnership approach with financial advisers regarding incoming legislation, rather than treating the industry as “guinea pigs”.
There have been strong numbers of returning advisers this year so far, according to Wealth Data, already surpassing the same period for 2024.
