Life/risk debate remuneration focused

FPA risk/life

14 October 2015
| By Malavika |
image
image
expand image

The recent debate on the life insurance reforms have centred on remuneration rather than the quality of life insurance advice provided to consumers, the Financial Planning Association (FPA) said.

Chief executive, Mark Rantall, made the comments as the association launched a life insurance advice guide to help advisers apply the FPA Code of Professional Practice to life-risk advice.

"We have produced this guide to help members identify and address common omissions and errors in the provision of advice relating to life insurance," Rantall said.

"A better advice process, well-structured advice, improved client servicing, and a well-defined value proposition will help build public trust and confidence in life insurance advice, and ultimately the profession as a whole."

The FPA released a 10-point Life Insurance Blueprint in May, which, among other things, called for commissions to remain and to be higher initially to reflect the costs of providing initial advice, said advisers should be partly responsible for retaining the policy and that commissions should be reversed for up to the first two years of a new policy, called for a ban on other forms of conflicted remuneration, and proposed a transition period of no more than three years to the new model.

Responding to the blueprint, the Association of Financial Advisers' chief executive, Brad Fox, said the two associations seemed to be united on the direction in which advisers should be headed in the life/risk space.

The guide, which was compiled with input from FPA members, has ten principles and is divided into eight sections, and includes parts of the corporate regulator's Life Insurance Advice Checklist.

The guide applies to both comprehensive and limited (staged or scaled) advice.

A clear value proposition for life insurance advice was rarely limited to a one-off transaction, and the guide would help advisers support clients over the long-term ad their circumstances changed, Rantall said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

 

Recommended for you

 

MARKET INSIGHTS

sub-bg sidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

PETER JOHNSTON- AIOFP

The FSC should have thought about this when they cooperated with O'Dywer/Frydenberg/Hume/FPA/AFA 10 years ago when this...

1 hour ago
Simon J

Sick of it. Canberra is a joke....

2 hours ago
Simon J

This is really concerning.... C'mon Canberra, sort this nonsense out. ...

2 hours ago

AustralianSuper and Australian Retirement Trust have posted the financial results for the 2022–23 financial year for their combined 5.3 million members....

10 months ago

A $34 billion fund has come out on top with a 13.3 per cent return in the last 12 months, beating out mega funds like Australian Retirement Trust and Aware Super. ...

9 months 3 weeks ago

The verdict in the class action case against AMP Financial Planning has been delivered in the Federal Court by Justice Moshinsky....

10 months ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND