Legislative change prompts fears of a 'Pandora's Box'

australian-financial-services/dealer-group/federal-government/financial-ombudsman-service/disclosure/compliance/dealer-groups/margin-loans/financial-advisers/

14 July 2009
| By Liam Egan |
image
image image
expand image

The Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) discussion paper on margin lending regulations has made real the concerns of dealer groups regarding altering their Australian Financial Services Licences (AFSLs).

The inclusion of margin lending under the Federal Government’s newly released National Consumer Credit Reform Package will require dealer groups to apply to ASIC for a variation of their AFSLs to continue to provide these loans in debt-related strategies.

GB Financial Management general manager Glenn Pearce said the change would require the dealer group to “decide by December next year whether we will change our licence to be able to continue that practice”.

In the meantime, he said, the dealer group will need to assess what potential impact the new bill is going to have on the advice strategies it presents to clients.

“Our concern over the change is less about our ability to recommend margin loans to clients and more about margin loans as a component of an overall strategy.

“If we decide not to apply for a variation we would have to evaluate how we present strategies to our clients, because we would not be able to specifically name the lending provider or its product in our strategy.

“In other words, we could be precluded from even the simple act of recommending that a client change a bank account unless we change our licence under the proposed changes.”

Australian Financial Services head of compliance Michael Butler said his “first impression” of the proposed legislation is that it is “far too complicated in replicating existing compliance and disclosure requirements”.

“I’m still not sure whether it’s sufficient for us to be licensed at the dealer group level

or whether the actual advisers are going

to be separately licensed.”

He said it was also unclear from the legislation “in its current form” whether it would also take in structured products that have a loan component attached to it.

“I can see that that issue alone will open up a real Pandora’s Box of issues for financial advisers, as well as accountants and product providers.”

Another consideration of the legislation for advisers is that the Financial Ombudsman Service (FOS) is charged with hearing complaints, he said.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 4 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 1 hour ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo