Labor details super switch policy proposal
Banning exit fees on super funds and restricting statements of advice to less than four pages will form part of Labor’s new financial services policy platform to be released within the year.
Speaking to Money Management this morning, Shadow Minister for Financial Services Nick Sherry said these proposals would be worked into the Financial Services Reform Act if Labor was to win the next election.
Sherry also labelled the Australian Securities and Investments Commission’s (ASIC) discussion paper on conflicts of interests released yesterday as “yet another damning overview”.
He claimed that there is a lack of effective consumer protection in the financial services industry and that disclosure is often insufficient.
“It is useless in many cases — unreadable disclosure documents of 50 -100 pages does not provide protection,” Sherry said.
“Simpler, standard, readable disclosure with tougher regulation on anti-competitive practices is required.”
These comments follow the release of ASIC’s hypothetical case studies, which suggest that accompanying internal controls are generally always needed to ensure that the quality of the underlining service is not compromised.
ASIC also recommended that advisers avoid being paid solely by commissions as a matter of best practice.
Sherry has repeatedly called for the abolishment of pure commission based selling of financial advice.
Recommended for you
The popularity of ETFs, which are approaching $200 billion in Australia, is a potential threat to the advice landscape if consumers opt to invest directly, according to this senior partner.
A former AMP financial adviser has urged advisers in the BOLR class action against AMP to object to the “unfair and unreasonable” $100 million settlement sum as the objection deadline approaches on 22 May.
Two Victoria-based financial advice practices have merged and rebranded as Forbes Fava Saville Financial Planning, as the firm realises the benefits of added scale.
The Financial Services and Credit Panel has made its latest ruling over a case involving an incorrect Statement of Advice.