Industry’s anti-money laundering fears calmed

financial-services-industry/IFSA/insurance/federal-government/ifsa-chief-executive/financial-planning-association/financial-planners/superannuation-industry/chief-executive/fund-managers/life-insurance/real-estate/

13 September 2005
| By Ross Kelly |

The financial services industry says the Federal Government has gone a long way to arresting fears that any proposed anti-money laundering legislation would heap unfathomable costs on banks, insurance agents, fund managers and financial planners.

The Minister for Justice and Customs, Chris Ellison, held a meeting recently with senior figures of the financial services industry, including the Investment and Financial Services Association (IFSA), the Financial Planning Association and the Australian Bankers’ Association (ABA), to discuss the progress of draft anti-money laundering legislation, which the Government obliged itself to produce after agreeing to adopt international standards in 2003.

Financial services, real estate, gem and precious metal, and casino businesses are all particularly concerned by the Paris-based Financial Action Task Force’s “know your client” recommendation, which requests businesses that routinely take large deposits of money to keep a database of their clients’ personal details.

IFSA welcomed Ellison’s support of the adoption of a “risk-based” approach to handling the issue, so industry sectors where the risk of terrorists attempting to launder money may be lower, such as in the life insurance or superannuation industry, would have their requirements scaled down.

“We say only the industry can identify what those risks are,” said IFSA chief executive Richard Gilbert.

He said the Government was also receptive to its request to let the industry develop its own codes, which would operate under legislation that covers broader issues, rather than forcing the industry to adopt more specific requirements.

“The legislation must recognise that any proposals must be commercially savvy. If we don’t and we impose unreasonable burdens, the terrorists would have won — they would have affected the capital system.”

A spokesperson for the ABA added that the Minister had also shot down concerns that the industry would be forced to identify clients already identified under the Financial Transaction Reports Act (FTRA).

Anyone who opens a bank account is already identified under FTRA legislation.

Read more about:

AUTHOR

Recommended for you

sub-bgsidebar subscription

Never miss the latest news and developments in wealth management industry

MARKET INSIGHTS

The succession dilemma is more than just a matter of commitments.This isn’t simply about younger vs. older advisers. It’...

1 week 5 days ago

Significant ethical issues there. If a relationship is in the process of breaking down then both parties are likely to b...

1 month ago

It's not licensees not putting them on, it's small businesses (that are licensed) that cannot afford to put them on. The...

1 month 1 week ago

AMP has settled on two court proceedings: one class action which affected superannuation members and a second regarding insurer policies. ...

4 days 20 hours ago

ASIC has released the results of the latest adviser exam, with August’s pass mark improving on the sitting from a year ago. ...

2 weeks ago

The inquiry into the collapse of Dixon Advisory and broader wealth management companies by the Senate economics references committee will not be re-adopted. ...

3 weeks ago

TOP PERFORMING FUNDS

ACS FIXED INT - AUSTRALIA/GLOBAL BOND
Powered by MOMENTUM MEDIA
moneymanagement logo